Roughly two hours after the earthquake responsible for bringing residents of the Eastern seaboard to their Tweets, a stark naked, knife-wielding individual was politely asked to drop his weapon. A woman standing nearby told police officers that the assailant had attacked another woman also in the vicinity. The incident took place just west of 158th street and Broadway. Pictures below.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
For burgeoning bands of the jegging persuasion, pop, specifically lo-fi pop, is in. It’s been in. It will remain in for years to come whether I/you/we like it or not. And for the most part, I could do with a breather from the fuzz, not because the aesthetic itself lacks merit, but because it’s increasingly become a means for those with nothing to say to say a lot of it, cheaply and in rapid succession.
Fans of the genre generally appear in favor of this triviality — citing it as a triviality — and altogether ignoring the conspicuously problematic homogeneity arising when bands who can’t really play their instruments — and singers who can’t really sing — choose to drown their shortcomings in the aurally forgiving seas of reverb and compression, in short, rendering one two-and-a-half-minute blur virtually indistinguishable from the next.
While the musicianship isn’t anything to gawk at, “Runaways” exhibits a surprisingly strong song structure, the narrators charging its action to verses of conflicting endpoints juxtaposed by lumbering chord progressions. From a chance seized at the apex of a relationship:
With the others left behind
I don’t care because you’re mine
We don’t need to settle down
Let them watch as we throw it all away
To divergence, amicable albeit delayed:
Once we make it to the end
We can always just pretend
We don’t need to settle down
Let them watch as we throw it all away
Overall, the song is dauntless, hopelessly so, braving the consequences of failing at one endeavor while simultaneously continuing upon the very path it’s set, which in the case of “Runaways” is no path at all. It exists as an ode to conviction, extolling the importance of taking bold, certain chances on the unconventional and monumentally uncertain. As well as people. Particularly people. People if nothing else.
The difficulty in writing about “Runaways” lies in my obvious desire to highlight how its aural qualities bolster its content and not vice versa — an order worth noting for its sheer rarity in this arena — rather than discussing how these aural qualities, in and of themselves, affect the listener. The track’s concise portrayal of extremes reveals more than could any hammocked laundry list of hypothetical events. And while the musically spirited charge of “Runaways’” reticent chorus hints otherwise, it is precisely that reticence which leads me to view their omissions as signals to fill in the blanks.
Briefly, by insisting that songs can engage listeners through means other than the habitual regurgitation of infelicities certain to resonate with 20-somethings, Reading Rainbow successfully avoid coddling indifferent passerby, if only this once.
Though on a sadder note, the regular discussion and praise of outliers such as “Runaways” appears greatly diminished, perhaps indefinitely, and I foresee little occurring to quell the 21st century’s call to chronically consume newer and newer media, a much-lamented decline of standards and stamina where everyone from critic to casual listener hears once and moves on to the next, which of course, and particularly in this case, is more of the same. On the other hand, this fervent dedication to uniformity, for all its many drawbacks, may very well be the closest we come in this day to a universal blink of approval.
Regardless, it’s difficult to keep from feeling as though lo-fi pop has been reduced to anything other than some ubiquitous glory hole, in which we press our ears against the slats and walk away, some moments later, with the fleeting sensation of something satisfactory.
I’d extend this train of thought to matters of longevity, but there seems little point: No one will cover these songs — no one will remember to.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
The wonderful thing about lurking in the background as a wayward, traffic-oblivious music website is the freedom to idolize lingering obsessions some six months or more after their initial discovery.
Sharon Van Etten’s forlorn ruminations spent the better part of winter idly swinging their legs from the speakers and turntables of everyone who’d managed to get their hands on them. Etten’s collection of melancholy folk songs, candidly titled Because I Was In Love, comes across as the ultimate exercise in self-preservation.
“I Wish I Knew” has no home, no shoes, is frayed cuffs and stems; the subdued strumming and doleful timbre do well to paint it as the type of inward reflection born of dissipation. As such, it comes as little surprise when, just shy of the finish line, Etten’s voice starts to teeter, the warbled melody aimless, the integrity of the track suddenly compromised.
“Haunting” may be as overused an adjective in music journalism as “chanteuse” is as a noun. As much as I’d like to ascribe these titles to Etten, her music leaps between both too often to truly be either, pitting the ghostly, multilayered vocals of “For You” against the unwavering clarity of “I Wish I Knew.”
Regardless, Etten’s shortcomings are minimal. (Yes, even a year later.)
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Nestled among contemporary music journalism’s gravest shortcomings lies an inability to discuss distortion-loving female singer-songwriters unapologetically.
In lieu of objective criticism, we dedicate hours to justifying the shortcomings of popular female acts while relegating others to digital obscurity. Praise comes easily enough when we strike upon women releasing one devastating song after another, and we happily fête those who excel at the uncommon, say by straddling harps or by boasting perpetually bewildered, doe-eyed expressions. Now granted, some of these performers occasionally walk the musical middle ground between tempestuous and demure, but even then, it’s only a smattering of women actively sidestepping the pop/electro/acoustic-train to Sad Town.
Despite the rash of lauded lo-fi records released by women of late, how often do these artists actually manage to breach their devoted niche audiences? Some would say very. People are ravenous for Best Coast; Dum Dum Girls are opening for Beach House and Vampire Weekend; Coasting, Brooklyn’s latest insufferable girl duo, even opened for The Clean. I get it, really. Fuzzy women are A-OK. But is that it? Is an opening slot the most one can aspire to these days as a non-major frontwoman with inclinations toward the raucous?
Two years have passed since insightful reviews championing the efforts of guitar behemoth Marnie Stern flooded the Internet. Perhaps the dearth I lament is only a temporary lull. Or perhaps I should resign myself to a likely correlation between diminishing opportunities for nurturing artists with an ever-fragmenting critical landscape.
An overall waning interest in rock remains as much a culprit as the lack of coverage of its proponents. After all, a few of the latter admittedly continue to exist, though it would appear we’ve sacrificed our interest in discussing the content produced by today’s women of rock in favor of discussing the context in which it appears, either visually or temporally.
Canada’s Land Of Talk is a band who would have owned college radio back in its heyday. As you may have noticed, they’re loud. And catchy. And technically capable. The founding members met in a jazz program (note to jazz musicians: you, too, can start a successful indie rock band). And yes, while lead singer Elizabeth Powell’s attractiveness certainly isn’t hindering the band, I’d never cite it as the primary cause for the considerable admiration and respect Land Of Talk has garnered over the past few years.
For others, the throwbacks will have to do. The bland harmonies under repetitive power chords? Well, they’ll have to do as well, I guess. But please, someone tell me when a woman who’d actually pick up an electric guitar and play it — one who’d sing into a microphone and ultimately do her best to craft a quality song that was, above all else, hers — morphed into some nonexistent mythical figure. What confluence of events could have possibly brought us here, where the most we seem capable of asking female rockers is a glimpse at the past and a set of cute bangs?
I can understand how decades’ worth of undocumented female jazz instrumentalists may have led to the current lack of renown female performers within that genre; everyone needs someone of their likeness to admire. With rock, however, somewhere along the way things just died.
Rock had The Slits. It had Sleater-Kinney and Electrelane. It had Kim Gordon of Sonic Youth.
Not to mention the non-white female guitarists.
Despite what Elle may have led you to believe with its recent, all-pasty edition of The 12 Greatest Female Electric Guitarists, there have been countless rocking women of color who, unsurprisingly, remain largely unknown. If you’ve never heard Sister Rosetta Tharpe, I highly suggest viewing the video below.
It’s difficult to avoid feeling as though a new, critically-imposed/hype-driven glass ceiling has formed for musicians of all backgrounds, one kept in place by authoritative sources repeatedly failing to discern spectacle from substance.
That said, at the end of the day, thank God for Blonde Redhead. And Marnie Stern. And Brilliant Colors. And Shannon and the Clams. And for others I’m not partial to but respect (e.g. Screaming Females). And for all the unknowns who deserve better than our ignorance of them.
And, yes, obviously for Land of Talk.
Say what you will about the charming nature of the Vivian Girls, Dum Dum Girls, and, hey, even Brooklyn’s burgeoning Girls at Dawn, I have a hard time imagining anyone caring to debate the matter of these bands’ authenticity. Shannon and the Clams may harp on the sixties as well, but if you can’t hear the difference between Shannon’s “The Warlock In The Woods” and 90% of her contemporaries’ material we’ve likely reached an impasse.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
How would it sound if Broken Social Scene and The New Pornographers didn’t spend half their albums jerking off? Like the start of the new Here We Go Magic album, which, I’m sorry to report, proceeds to spend seven-tenths of its total running time jerking off. “Collector” remains a standout track. “Land Of Feeling” would as well were it not for a synth-induced identity crisis encountered at its halfway mark.